Out in the field – applying the skills
Posted on: 28 September, 2015
Ewan Craig, APC assessor and Programme Leader for the BSc [Hons] in Building Surveying at The College of Estate Management (CEM), is a regular speaker at the RICS annual ‘It’s Your APC’ conference, and contributor to the RICS Building Surveying Journal.
In a recent contribution to the RICS Building Surveying Journal themed on ‘ Backing Innovation‘ , Ewan discussed the competency of development/project briefs Please read on for a summary of his thoughts on ‘keeping to the brief’.
Keeping to the brief: the competency of project briefs
Development briefs and project briefs are one of the optional competencies of the building surveying Assessment of Professional Competence (APC). Preparing these briefs demands a good ability to apply mandatory and technical competencies, for example:
- Client care: to collect data, analyse and define the needs of clients to develop the brief
- Legal/regulatory compliance: awareness of planning legislation and Building Regulations.
The three aspects to consider are: the difference between the levels (1 -3), what level the question/s are aimed at and what response is needed.
1) The levels
At level 1: Demonstrate knowledge of the techniques used for cost, quality and time-related forensic examinations in your area of practice.
At level 2: Apply your knowledge of cost, quality and time-related examinations in your area of practice.
At level 3: Provide evidence of reasoned advice and report to clients on cost, quality and time-related examinations in your area of practice.
2) Questions
Actual APC questions are based on the candidate’s experience, which should be at level 2 but could exceed this. Two examples are given below.
- Could you please explain how the criteria for success in the project brief were arrived at in project X?(this is aimed at level 2 but could be extended to level 3)
I was reassigned to a new client account team in firm Y; this was my first project with them. I was conscious that I would need to familiarise myself with their business needs and objectives for the project because these would identify the overall requirements for the project and direct me on the issues that matter to the company. I find it is critical to appreciate that a project is there to further my client’s business so their needs must be met.
The client also had other related projects. It was important that these were considered, because at an operational level the projects needed to allow business continuity and would demand similar resources such as in-house staff and management. I discussed the business needs and objectives, together with its impact on related projects, for the project with the project sponsor in the client organisation and my manager.
These focused on a set time window when the works could be carried out, budget costs and resources, phasing with other projects and levels of quality in the client’s guidelines. I prepared a set of critical success factors, which would meet the business objectives for the project, that I confirmed with the project sponsor. This proved useful because feedback highlighted that part of the facility had to be handed over early. I revised the critical success factors and incorporated these in the project brief.
2. Would you please explain how you derived a list of risks for project Z and why consideration was at the project brief stage?(this is aimed at level 2.)
It is important to establish any known project risks because threats can then be managed through mitigation or elimination, and opportunities realised. Failure to do so could result in greater uncertainty in the successful project outcome.
I followed my practice’s methodology to risk management. The client’s appetite for risk was known and because the matter is subjective I checked the list with my manager, who was more familiar with the client, before sending it to the project sponsor. The risks were based on the project criteria and what could affect those that may vary or was unknown. This included costs such as market fluctuations, delays in gaining consents, and quality, such as a contractor’s failure to meet the client’s guidelines.
3) Care
And remember, given the time constraints, your answer should give a brief but whole response. Care should be taken to demonstrate your skills, abilities and knowledge to the assessors.
Catch future updates from Ewan, covering topics such as conservation and restoration, building pathology, and insurance. You can also follow our other blog authors and social channels – Facebook, Twitter & LinkedIn – for more industry updates and CEM news.
